And who created the Affordable Care Act? (and who has made it their life mission to kill??)
“Affordability” — YEAHHHHHHH…..
Go back to Epstein Island, you dumb self-serving pig.
Blog
-
The Donald J. Trump 50 Year Mortgage
I love how the extra 20 years saves you about 15% in your monthly payment but then more than doubles your interest–use long term compounding on your investments, not your extending the pain of paying off your house! (Really dumb Donald, you think we’re THAT STUPID!? I mean, just because YOU are doesn’t mean we are!)
-
Jon Stewart “Can’t F**king Believe” Democrats Caved on the Shutdown | The Daily Show
It’s unreal… (WTAF!?!?!!)
-
Analysis of Trump Jan 6th Pardon List
I took the list of pardon data from Jan-6.com and ran it through Claude.ai w/the following prompt:
please summarize all of the s*** these people did — and why any of them should be pardoned.
The RESPONSE (that I couldn’t agree more with):
Summary of January 6 Crimes and the Pardon Justification Question
What These People Actually Did:
The Most Serious Offenders (Seditious Conspiracy):
Oath Keepers & Proud Boys Leaders:
- Stewart Rhodes, Enrique Tarrio – Led organized groups that planned to stop the peaceful transfer of power through force
- Seditious conspiracy = literally plotting to overthrow the government
- Coordinated military-style operations with weapons caches
- Some stationed outside DC with firearms ready to bring in
Violent Assaults on Police Officers:
With Deadly Weapons:
- Beat officers with flagpoles, baseball bats, metal poles
- Sprayed officers with chemical irritants (pepper spray, bear spray)
- Used tasers/stun guns on officers (Daniel Rodriguez tasered Officer Fanone repeatedly)
- Threw fire extinguishers, furniture, barriers at police
- Dragged officers into crowds to be beaten
- Thomas Webster – attacked officer with flagpole, then metal gate
- David Dempsey – assaulted officers 20+ times with various weapons (got 20 years, the longest sentence)
Specific Brutal Acts:
- Thomas Sibick – stole Officer Fanone’s badge and radio while Fanone was being beaten and having a heart attack
- Julian Khater – sprayed Officer Sicknick and others with chemical spray (Sicknick died the next day)
- Christopher Quaglin – choked an officer, inflicted bodily injury (12 years)
- Multiple people caused serious bodily injury to officers
Obstruction & Property Destruction:
- Broke through police lines
- Smashed windows and doors of the Capitol
- Destroyed government property
- Prevented Congress from certifying election
- Some came armed with guns, knives, clubs
- Christopher Alberts – brought a loaded pistol, used pallet as battering ram
The Scale:
- 1,500+ pardons for people convicted after trials or guilty pleas
- These weren’t “tourists” – they were convicted by juries or pled guilty
- 140+ police officers injured
- Millions in property damage
- Democracy itself threatened
Why Should ANY of Them Be Pardoned?
Traditional Pardon Criteria – Do These Cases Meet Them?
1. Evidence of Innocence/Wrongful Conviction?
- ❌ NO – These people were convicted by juries who saw evidence
- ❌ Many pled guilty – they admitted they did it
- ❌ Had full due process – lawyers, trials, appeals
2. Excessive Sentences?
- ❌ Most sentences were below federal guidelines
- ❌ Judges (many appointed by Republicans) considered each case individually
- ❌ People who cooperated got lighter sentences; those who didn’t got harsher ones
3. Rehabilitation/Remorse?
- ❌ Many showed NO remorse
- ❌ Some gave Nazi salutes after conviction
- ❌ Many continue to claim they did nothing wrong
- ❌ Some threatened witnesses and officials
4. Service to Country/Community?
- ❌ They attacked the country
- ❌ They beat police officers trying to protect Congress
- ❌ They tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power
5. Time Served/Changed Circumstances?
- ❌ Many had just been sentenced
- ❌ Some hadn’t even started serving yet
- ❌ Tarrio got 22 years in May 2023, pardoned January 2025 – served less than 2 years
6. Injustice in Prosecution?
- ❌ Prosecuted under laws that existed before Jan 6
- ❌ Evidence was overwhelming (videos, their own social media posts)
- ❌ Had defense attorneys
- ❌ Could appeal (many did, unsuccessfully)
The Real “Justification”:
There is literally NO traditional pardon justification. The only “reason” is:
They were loyal to Trump.
That’s it. That’s the whole justification.
- They tried to keep him in power
- They believed his lies about the election
- They attacked the Capitol on his behalf
- Therefore: Pardoned
Why This Is Extraordinarily Dangerous:
1. It Rewards Political Violence
- Message: “Attack the government for Trump, get pardoned”
- Creates incentive for future violence
- Tells supporters violence has no consequences
2. It Disrespects Police
- 140+ officers injured
- Some permanently disabled
- Officers testified these were the worst attacks of their careers
- Trump claims to be “pro-police” while pardoning their attackers
3. It Undermines Rule of Law
- Thousands of hours of investigation
- Millions of dollars in prosecution costs
- Hundreds of trials
- All erased because of political loyalty
4. It Betrays the Officers Who Died
- Officer Brian Sicknick died
- Officer Howard Liebengood – suicide days later
- Officer Jeffrey Smith – suicide days later
- Multiple officers later died by suicide
- Their attackers: Pardoned
5. It Rewrites History
- Trump calls them “hostages” and “patriots”
- Reality: Convicted criminals who beat cops
- Tries to memory-hole the actual violence
The Ultimate Insult:
Some of these pardoned individuals:
- Gave Nazi salutes after conviction
- Threatened judges and prosecutors
- Showed zero remorse
- Said they’d do it again
- Still claim the election was stolen
And they were rewarded with full pardons.
Meanwhile:
- ✓ Officers who defended the Capitol have PTSD
- ✓ Some officers are permanently disabled
- ✓ American democracy was attacked
- ✓ The peaceful transfer of power was disrupted
Bottom Line:
There is ZERO legitimate justification for these pardons.
This isn’t about mercy, justice, or correcting wrongs. This is about:
- Rewarding loyalty
- Rewriting history
- Sending a message that political violence for Trump is acceptable
- Establishing that Trump supporters are above the law
These weren’t protesters exercising First Amendment rights. They were convicted criminals who:
- Beat police officers
- Broke into the Capitol
- Tried to stop the constitutional process
- Some plotted seditious conspiracy
Every single one was convicted through the legal system. Every single one had due process. Every single one was guilty.
And every single one was pardoned for one reason only: They did it for Trump.
That’s not how pardons are supposed to work. That’s authoritarianism.
-
7M Attend Peaceful “No Kings” Rallies | Trump Dumps On Times Square | George Santos Is A Free Man
Trump posted an AI king version of himself dumping poop on NYC…he’s literally a sh@t-stain.
“Trump is a one-man hate march.” -Colbert
“He is using satire to make a point” -Mike Johnson defending the pathetic poop video
-
Laughter Breaks Out As Moskowitz Absolutely Roasts Trump Over Alleged Epstein Birthday Book Doodle
310,775 views Sep 12, 2025
At Wednesday’s House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) mocked President Trump over the alleged Epstein birthday book doodle. -
Windsor – The Lincoln Project
The Lincoln Project is a leading pro-democracy organization in the United States — dedicated to the preservation, protection, and defense of democracy. Our fight against Trumpism is only beginning. We must combat these forces everywhere and at all times — our democracy depends on it.
-
Lawrence: Trump wants us to talk about Jimmy Kimmel. So we’ll talk about Trump & Jeffrey Epstein
The previously “most corrupt president” – Richard Nixon – never tried to get Johnny Carson fired for making fun of him.
-
Leaked Emails Reveal Epstein Wanted Trump Deleted From Mysterious Power List
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/leaked-emails-reveal-epstein-wanted-152233334.html
Leaked Emails Reveal Epstein Wanted Trump Deleted From Mysterious Power List
Tom Latchem
Thu, September 11, 2025 at 8:22 AM PDT
4 min read1.3k
Davidoff Studios Photography / Davidoff Studios/Getty Images Billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein told Ghislaine Maxwell to “remove” Donald Trump from a mysterious power list, according to a new cache of intriguing emails released Thursday.
The trove—more than 18,000 messages from Epstein’s Yahoo account published by Bloomberg—depicts Maxwell as closely involved in money movements, reputational pushback, and intimate logistics.”
One of the most startling Trump-related moments is disarmingly brief. On Sept. 14, 2006, Maxwell wrote, “Plse review list and add or remove peeps,” attaching a roster of 51 politicians, financiers, and power players.
Do the newly published emails show that the friendship was truly over? / Davidoff Studios/Getty Images The purpose of the list isn’t stated—Bloomberg could not determine it from the email itself, given that there was no subject line or context to indicate what it referred to—Epstein’s two-word reply was short but striking.
It said simply: “Remove trump.”
The removal of Trump’s name from whatever the list was came two months after Epstein was charged in Florida with solicitation of prostitution, and as federal scrutiny was snowballing.
A year later, Epstein would sign a secretive 2007 non-prosecution deal that spared him federal charges.
Some accounts suggest Epstein and Trump had fallen out in 2004, with some attributing that to a multi-million-dollar property deal dispute. Epstein was found dead in his cell in 2019, at the age of 66, while facing child sex trafficking charges.
However, Trump—under intense pressure to explain his friendship with Epstein—told reporters in late July that he cut ties after Epstein “stole” female employees who worked at his Mar-a-Lago private members club.
Yet a Daily Beast exclusive in early August reported that the billionaire financier had remained a member of the exclusive venue until October 2007, more than a year after he was indicted on one count of soliciting prostitution, and despite widespread media coverage that disclosed allegations of his sexual contact with minors.
The president has sought to play down his friendship with a man he described in 2002 as “a terrific guy,” as the 79-year-old fights the release of the files related to the late pedophile financier.
Maxwell, seen here attending the Polo Ralph Lauren host Victories of Athlete Ally at Polo Ralph Lauren Store on November 3, 2015 in New York City, continued to be a fixture on the social scene long after Epstein was disgraced. / Jared Siskin / Jared Siskin/Patrick McMullan via Getty ImagesMore And this latest exchange between Epstein and his associate and co-conspirator Maxwell, 63—who is serving a 20-year sentence for child sex trafficking—perhaps indicates that the friendship between Epstein and Trump had truly ended.
The messages also add detail to a well-documented social overlap in the late ’90s and early 2000s, including the widely seen 2000 photo of Trump, wife Melania, Epstein, and Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago, and coverage of numerous events where the now-president crossed paths with Epstein and Maxwell.
This latest release of Maxwell’s emails is likely to do little to quell the storm of questions facing him about Epstein.
-
Comprehensive set of court docs found via Reddit post
FROM https://news.joshwho.net/p/full-epstein-client-list-and-un-redacted
Poor Donald Trump is only #78 on the list –
you can be he’s disappointed!Unredacted copy of the Black Book is available.
Full Epstein Client list and un redacted Black Book Available
I have been sitting on these files for a while now and Just noticed Archive.org had them deleted, So I restored it all.
Jul 07, 2025
Bookshelves
Seeing what the current Trump admin DOJ just did saying there is no client list🙄 really pisses me off knowing I have and had this list for so long already.
I originally had all of this on my old news site and that server was deleted a few years ago do to no funding.
I use to be able to access this all from Archive.org but just noticed today it has all been deleted.
Seems like they thought all their bases was covered before saying this list doesn’t exist.
The 943 pages of court documents from Virginia Giuffre’s trial against Maxwell are the source from which the names were extracted. Has nothing to do with the black book.
Bookshelves
The black book, which is the complete, unredacted version of Jeffrey Epstein’s Rolodex and notes, is another factor.
I included it for anyone that wants to go through it all.
Bookshelves
You can download the full 943 pages of DOJ Giuffre vs Maxwell docs that goes through this list here: https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0-combined.pdf
I also have the full un redacted Epstein Black Book available as well here
Bookshelves
https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/black-book-unredacted.pdf
These names come from the 943 pages of DOJ Giuffre vs Maxwell.
Has nothing to do with the black book.
Bookshelves
Comprehensive List of Unique Names:
- Virginia L. Giuffre
- Ghislaine Maxwell
- Jeffrey Epstein
- Sigrid McCawley
- Meredith Schultz
- David Boies
- Bradley J. Edwards
- Juan Alessi
- Maria Alessi
- Dave Rodgers
- Laura A. Menninger
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
- Johanna Sjoberg
- Bill Clinton
- Ross Gow
- Sarah Kellen
- Nadia Marcincova
- Jane Doe #1
- Jane Doe #2
- Jane Doe #3
- Jane Doe #4
- Alan Dershowitz
- Paul G. Cassell
- Julie Brown
- Christine N. Walz
- Sanford L. Bohrer
- Ty Gee
- Loretta A. Preska
- Robert W. Sweet
- Sharon Churcher
- Glenn Dubin
- Stephen Kaufmann
- Prince Andrew
- Jean-Luc Brunel
- Bill Richardson
- Marvin Minsky
- Michael Cernovich
- Lesley Groff
- Jane Doe 43
- Wendy Olsen
- Joseph Pecorino
- Analisa Torres
- Nicholas J. Lewin
- Paul M. Krieger
- Howard M. Cooper
- Nicole J. Moss
- Christian G. Kiely
- Stanley Pottinger
- Ellen Brockman
- Stephen Zac
- Brittany Henderson
- Bob Josefsberg
- Katherine Ezell
- Amy Ederi
- Eric J. [last name not specified]
- Kathy Alexander
- Miles Alexander
- James Michael
- John Doe 107
- John Doe 110
- John Doe 171
- Banu Kucukkoylu
- George Mitchell
- Ehud Barak
- Les Wexner
- Ron Burkle
- Frederic Fekkai
- Tom Pritzker
- Michael Jackson
- David Copperfield
- Stephen Hawking
- Emmy Taylor
- Cindy Lopez
- Doug Band
- Sarah Ransome
- Al Gore
- Tipper Gore
- Donald Trump
- Chris Donahue
- Wah Wah
- Judith Lightfoot
- Karen Kutikoff
- Carol Hayek
- John Harris
- Darshanee Majaliyana
- Mona Devansean
- Scott Robert Geiger
- Michele Streeter
- Donna Oliver
- Tony Figueroa
- Arthur L. Aidala
- Diana Fabi Samson
- Audrey Strauss
- Geoffrey Berman
- Neama Rahmani
- Angel Urena
- Graydon Carter
- Jennifer Araoz
- Chauntae Davies
- Bob Weinstein
- Mike Wallace
- Joan Rivers
- Kevin Spacey
- Chuck Schumer
- Peter Soros
- Lynn Forester de Rothschild
- Ethel Kennedy
- Sergey Brin
- Eva Andersson-Dubin
- Rikki Klieman
- Adam Reiss
- Tom Winter
- Sarah Fitzpatrick
Notes:
- Document Context: The document (gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0) is a motion filed by Virginia Giuffre’s attorneys to exceed the ten-deposition limit, specifically listing individuals like Juan Alessi, Maria Alessi, Dave Rodgers, Johanna Sjoberg, Bill Clinton, Ross Gow, Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcincova as proposed deponents.
- Other names, such as attorneys (e.g., Sigrid McCawley, Laura A. Menninger) and judges (e.g., Loretta A. Preska), are included as they are directly involved in the legal proceedings.
- Additional Names: Names like Emmy Taylor, Cindy Lopez, and Doug Band come from related case documents, such as flight logs or mentions in depositions. Medical providers (e.g., Chris Donahue, Wah Wah) are listed in the context of Giuffre’s treatment records.
- Names from X posts (e.g., Bob Weinstein, Sergey Brin) are included as they may appear in related filings, though their presence in this specific document is less certain.
- Pseudonyms and Redactions: The list includes pseudonyms (e.g., Jane Doe #1–#4, John Doe 107) and redacted names as referenced in the sources. These are counted as unique individuals where specified.
- Exclusions: I excluded names of judges, court staff, or legal representatives not directly tied to the document’s content (e.g., those only mentioned in passing in media reports) unless explicitly referenced in the filing or depositions.
- Names like “another prince” or “large hotel chain owner” were not included due to lack of specificity.
- Limitations: Without direct access to the full document, some names may still be missing.
- The sources suggest nearly 200 names across the Giuffre v. Maxwell case filings, but not all are in this specific document. Names like Michael Jackson, Stephen Hawking, and David Copperfield appear in related depositions or emails but may not be in the motion itself.
- Verification: Being named does not imply wrongdoing, as many individuals are witnesses, staff, or tangentially connected. Some names (e.g., Eric J.) are incomplete due to partial information in the sources.
Virginia Giuffre’s sudden death that smells more like a Clintonside than anything, was an attempt to try to stop this.
Virginia Giuffre is a name you are familiar with. As a survivor who confronted billionaires and predators in broad daylight, challenging them to deny their actions, she was among the most courageous voices to speak out against the elite pedophile network.
What Do They Have to Hide? Judicial Watch Battles Kash Patel and Pam Bondi for Documents
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/bEpljHO6w8Y?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/qFuUhIU3WmI?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0
Mossad insider: Jeffrey Epstein is still alive in Israel and is extorting American politicians.
·
Jun 26
The official narrative has been completely overturned by shocking disclosures from Israel: Epstein did not commit suicide. as he never passed away.
FBI Chief Kash Patel said he hasn’t seen the pathologist’s report indicating Epstein was strangled to death.😳
·
Jun 7
It has been acknowledged by FBI Director Kash Patel that he has not received the pathologist’s report stating that Jeffrey Epstein was strangled to death.
🚨Bongino and Patel “Looked Like Hostages, saying Epstein killed himself.” Megyn Kelly said, claiming 🧐
·
May 31
Regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case, Megyn Kelly has criticized FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino for not being “fully transparent.”
Ex-Epstein Employee Discusses Zorro Ranch New Mexico Baby Farm
·
Jun 4
According to an interview with Eddy Aragon, Jeffrey Epstein established a “baby farm” here with the goal of producing sex slaves and a superior race.
FBI “Finds” Epstein Suicide Footage🙄Six Years After “Malfunctioning Cameras” and Denial, WTF??
·
May 29
The FBI abruptly disclosed the finding of video footage that allegedly confirms Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide after six years of claiming that both surveillance cameras malfunctioned during Epstein’s death.
Mossad insider: Jeffrey Epstein is still alive in Israel and is extorting American politicians.
·
Jun 26
The official narrative has been completely overturned by shocking disclosures from Israel: Epstein did not commit suicide. as he never passed away.
Subscribe to me please and thank you. I am always trying to search for the answerer and will not stop until it is found.
·
Jun 18
Please help support if you can. Dono links are pinned on home page. Please and thank you. Your support is what helps keeps me doing what I am doing. Love you all and thank you again.
-
Bloomberg: 18,000 Epstein emails reveal secret conversations
Peter Mandelson was fired as Britain’s ambassador to the United States on Thursday after his ties to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein became another unwelcome problem for the embattled Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Bloomberg published a trove of emails between Mandelson and Epstein, in which Mandelson expressed support for his friend and offered to discuss his infamous 2008 Florida case with his political contacts.
-
Trump’s Name Is on Contributor List for Epstein Birthday …
NY Times Article — if you don’t have a subscription, look at this Google Query to see the AI Summary — pasted below:
As part of a trove of documents released by the House Oversight Committee in September 2025, a redacted copy of a “birthday book” compiled for Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003 was made public. The book’s contributor list and a specific submission bearing Donald Trump’s name have received significant attention.
The alleged Trump submission
- The item: The book contains a message with an apparent signature of “Donald” written inside the silhouette of a naked woman.
- The content: The note quotes a fabricated conversation between Epstein and Trump and concludes, “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret”.
- The denial: Trump and the White House have repeatedly denied that he wrote the note or drew the picture. When the Wall Street Journal first reported on the item in July 2025, Trump called it “a fake thing” and sued the newspaper. The White House continues to deny the note’s authenticity, stating that the signature is not Trump’s.
- The context: The Wall Street Journal and other outlets have reported that the signature and wording bear similarities to other authenticated Trump writings from that era.
Other notable information in the book
- Other contributors: The book lists other prominent figures, including former President Bill Clinton, investor Leslie Wexner, and then-UK ambassador Peter Mandelson, as “friends” who submitted messages.
- Content and tone: Compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s associate, the book features a wide range of content, from innocent notes from Epstein’s mother to numerous crude and lewd messages that celebrated Epstein’s behavior.
- Another Trump mention: A separate page includes a photo of an oversized, novelty check with a phony “DJTRUMP” signature. A handwritten caption below jokingly states that Epstein “sells a ‘fully depreciated’ [redacted] to Donald Trump for $22,500”.
- Trump-Epstein relationship: The birthday book provides further evidence of the social connection between Trump and Epstein during the late 1990s and early 2000s, before Epstein’s first conviction.
Political and legal fallout
- Political firestorm: The release of the book has intensified the political debate over the handling of Epstein-related documents. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the files, but the process has been marked by partisan disagreements over what should be released and whether to compel testimony from certain figures.
- Ongoing litigation: Trump’s defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal is ongoing. The White House has stated it will “aggressively pursue litigation” over the publication of the material.
additional info here:
Democrats rekindle Trump’s Epstein problem with birthday note –
www.ft.com/content/90d14e99-7bad-4126-826c-1d1cde7bcaab
YES!
